The Journaling of Rohde 847
Subtitle
Blog
The Dilemmas of Naturism and Sexuality Openly Discussed:
|
|
Naturism and Sexuality looks like a hot subject nowadays. We at Nudist Portal get a ton of of e-mails and questions each and every day about this very matter.
This week we got one such e-mail, from a youthful individual, who desired to know how do we distinguish naturism and sexuality?
His e-mail read as follows:
"How does one separate sexuality from nudity? Don't get me wrong; I'm not attacking nudists, I need to be one. I think my question is: When does it become too sexualized? I presume that is what gets textile people's textiles in a group. Where's the context?"
As opposed to give a straight answer to those questions, Jordan Blum determined to break them down a little in a dialog with Paul Rapoport, the former, longtime editor of Going Natural.
What would you think of the questions?
They are fundamental and significant. Although most naturists may understand the principal reply to their own satisfaction, I Had like to begin with a little context, as the questioner asks. Let us consider the sex issue from a cultural viewpoint, and the difficulties it poses for naturists.
Going Natural Magazine
What is the result?
You know, You can not show that!
But nudity is everyw here in the media, we're told.
In fundamental mass media, just coy versions of nudity: a censored, untrue nudity, with no showing this or that consistently running, and an overwhelming emphasis on young women of a specific sort. All that should truly annoy naturists.
But does https://s3.amazonaws.com/l-naturist/family-nudism-photos.html benefit naturism any?
Perhaps, but it comes from a different area, the exploitation of the obsession with sex. That's targeted at the chief decision makers: middle-aged, middle-class, heterosexual men.
Naturism's actual nudity of many different actual folks doing anything but hanging around in passive poses would bust up the game by making the exploitation substantially harder.
What's the simplest way to attack that?
We're able to try sense! To most people, if there's an image of sex, it must affect nudity. Hence, if there is https://s3.amazonaws.com/l-naturist/nude-beach-pictures.html of nudity, it must demand sex. Is that reasonable?
Naturists understand the answer to that.
I'd place this to non-naturists, then: If there's an image of a man, it must be a person. Hence, if there is an image of a human, it must be a guy.
That illogicality is the same as the one involving nudity. Unfortunately, sense is an enemy of forces of mass exploitation.
Why do not we just say that nudism is not sexual and leave it at that?
Because it is complicated, and on an easy level I don't believe it's accurate.
How can naturists cope with all that in practice, rather than theory?
The easiest way to distinguish nudity from sexuality is to keep to the practice of nonsexualized nudity. The -ed is important, making nonsexualized mean not overtly sexual. In other words, naturist activities don't have any added sexual component beyond what bodies generally have when clothed.
But even that's a tough sale. To non-naturists, eating, swimming, or playing volleyball without clothing is either ridiculous or sexually provocative. They've bought into the wrong two-way automatic association between nudity and sexual expression.
Don't naturists have an even more difficult time understanding? They are generally critical of conduct that would be acceptable in a non nude event.
Naturism and Sexuality - What's Too Sexual For Nudists?
Politically in the united states, particularly during its more repressive periods, naturists have had to disavow any connection with sex. To fight the belief they are sexual deviants or threats, they try to act less sexual than everyone else.
Part of that is a practical defense, especially for girls in the existence of men: when clothes come off, more borders are on. Interpersonal bounds are fortified. But it may certainly be overdone.
How may it be overdone?
That seems odd now. Today, there are other naturist taboos. There must always be some. Different naturists may have distinct views on them.
Such as?
Some say that guys shouldn't be allowed erections, or that women should not sit with their legs apart.
This week we got one such e-mail, from a youthful individual, who desired to know how do we distinguish naturism and sexuality?
His e-mail read as follows:
"How does one separate sexuality from nudity? Don't get me wrong; I'm not attacking nudists, I need to be one. I think my question is: When does it become too sexualized? I presume that is what gets textile people's textiles in a group. Where's the context?"
As opposed to give a straight answer to those questions, Jordan Blum determined to break them down a little in a dialog with Paul Rapoport, the former, longtime editor of Going Natural.
What would you think of the questions?
They are fundamental and significant. Although most naturists may understand the principal reply to their own satisfaction, I Had like to begin with a little context, as the questioner asks. Let us consider the sex issue from a cultural viewpoint, and the difficulties it poses for naturists.
Going Natural Magazine
What is the result?
You know, You can not show that!
But nudity is everyw here in the media, we're told.
In fundamental mass media, just coy versions of nudity: a censored, untrue nudity, with no showing this or that consistently running, and an overwhelming emphasis on young women of a specific sort. All that should truly annoy naturists.
But does https://s3.amazonaws.com/l-naturist/family-nudism-photos.html benefit naturism any?
Perhaps, but it comes from a different area, the exploitation of the obsession with sex. That's targeted at the chief decision makers: middle-aged, middle-class, heterosexual men.
Naturism's actual nudity of many different actual folks doing anything but hanging around in passive poses would bust up the game by making the exploitation substantially harder.
What's the simplest way to attack that?
We're able to try sense! To most people, if there's an image of sex, it must affect nudity. Hence, if there is https://s3.amazonaws.com/l-naturist/nude-beach-pictures.html of nudity, it must demand sex. Is that reasonable?
Naturists understand the answer to that.
I'd place this to non-naturists, then: If there's an image of a man, it must be a person. Hence, if there is an image of a human, it must be a guy.
That illogicality is the same as the one involving nudity. Unfortunately, sense is an enemy of forces of mass exploitation.
Why do not we just say that nudism is not sexual and leave it at that?
Because it is complicated, and on an easy level I don't believe it's accurate.
How can naturists cope with all that in practice, rather than theory?
The easiest way to distinguish nudity from sexuality is to keep to the practice of nonsexualized nudity. The -ed is important, making nonsexualized mean not overtly sexual. In other words, naturist activities don't have any added sexual component beyond what bodies generally have when clothed.
But even that's a tough sale. To non-naturists, eating, swimming, or playing volleyball without clothing is either ridiculous or sexually provocative. They've bought into the wrong two-way automatic association between nudity and sexual expression.
Don't naturists have an even more difficult time understanding? They are generally critical of conduct that would be acceptable in a non nude event.
Naturism and Sexuality - What's Too Sexual For Nudists?
Politically in the united states, particularly during its more repressive periods, naturists have had to disavow any connection with sex. To fight the belief they are sexual deviants or threats, they try to act less sexual than everyone else.
Part of that is a practical defense, especially for girls in the existence of men: when clothes come off, more borders are on. Interpersonal bounds are fortified. But it may certainly be overdone.
How may it be overdone?
That seems odd now. Today, there are other naturist taboos. There must always be some. Different naturists may have distinct views on them.
Such as?
Some say that guys shouldn't be allowed erections, or that women should not sit with their legs apart.
Categories: None
Post a Comment
Oops!
The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.
Oops!
Oops, you forgot something.